Posts

Have those who reject, not reflected that the heavens and the earth were a single entity, and We, the Source, initiated their separation, printing from a primal liquid element every living creation? Will they not then trust in the Source? Imagine we build a tool, like wooden chair or a desk. Such a craft scales if we end up writing some instructions which can be followed by another one to build the same craft without us need to work further on that. This is a free production as we don’t only give the craft but also the instructions to replicate it independently. These instructions gets upgraded and will be returend to us by the best user if the source license guatantees a separation. ...

The one who seven heavens is impossible otherwise, one above the other. You will never see any imperfection in instantiation of the one who is boundless being bound to womb-like compassion. So look again: Do you see any flaws? Then look again and again! Your sight will return exhausted and it is regret. Architecture is literally defined as, “formation or construction resulting from or as if from a conscious act”, “a unifying or coherent form or structure”, “a method or style of building”, “the manner in which the components of a computer or computer system are organized and integrated”. ...

It is known that “Power comes with Responsibility.” But what does it mean? To whom is one being responsible? And to whom is that “responsibility” accountable? Without knowing this, it flips into “Responsibility comes with power.” Basically, no power, no responsibility. And anyone taking responsibility is either a fool, has power, or is seeking power. The issue is they neither understand “responsibility” nor “power.” Power is the ability to save time. As a result of power, there is a remainder, which we receive as time. We can use that time to generate more power. Some define it as destructive equipment or access to media, etc. But these are byproducts of having power, not the power itself! This is the first mistake. There could still be power without conventional means. ...

One way to ensure things do not go off course is to secure an architecture. So, we will enforce some invariants on the system. We will use the term “invariant” to refer to the set of rules we want to enforce on the system. The idea is that if we can prove the system satisfies these invariants, we can be certain it will behave in a specific way. We should establish this invariant now, not later. The reason is that if we set it later, we don’t know when! So, it will be never when it can be later than any time! We will have to change the code to satisfy the invariant, and the later we set it, the harder it is to satisfy. So, not a second later—right now! ...

Advertising a government as secular comes with censorship on a large scale, as a government can only be secular when it is also owned by a secular entity! How can someone who must eat food and pay interest be secular? Even if all governments are secular, there must be a non-secular government and/or a secular non-government. Do they also speak about this? What type of non-secular government is that, and what type of non-government is that secular one, and how many providers of that can possibly exist? Any information they give about this? ...

Someone who does a thing has time, and someone who has time does a thing. And the one who takes some extra is powerful. If having more time always comes with more power, there must be an exception where having more time secures extinction. This happens gradually, then suddenly, as the host securing the succession will fight for power—full power. Fighting for more time, even though this nightmare comes along. ...

There is no “them” unless there is an “us,” and there is no “us” unless there is a “them.” The one that is not “us” is “non-us,” but the one that is not them is “us” as they assume. This is an asymmetric relationship. From their point of view, the one that is not “them” is “us”. We imagine “us,” “non-us,” and “them,” but the enemy imagines “us” and “them.” Our “us” and/or “non-us” and/or “them” is their “them” all the same. They are an enemy to themselves, not only to us! ...

Collect as much data as possible. This is because without information, we cannot make a top N query. For example, we want to find the best matching car based on budget, color, and other parameters. We need to collect data from car manufacturers, dealers, and other sources. This is essential to know what to do next. Data can be collected by any organization, university, or individual. The more data we have, the better our chances of finding a solution. Restricting one organization from collecting information is censoring that organization. It doesn’t matter who has censored the information — it could be the organization itself, the government, or any other entity. Why do we need an organization or corporation without any information stored or without any function performed on that information? ...

The term “secular” is defined as “of or relating to the worldly or temporal,” “not overtly or specifically religious,” “not clerical,” “not bound by monastic vows or rules,” “occurring once in an age or a century,” “existing or continuing through ages or centuries,” or “of or relating to a long term of indefinite duration.” If everything has to be secular, then one must be non-secular! But then how can secularism itself be indefinite and/or long-term, or occur once in an age or a century, or continue through ages or centuries, etc.? But what if the secular suddenly becomes anti-non-secular? Murder it and/or censor it? ...

If there is no suction, there must be one. It doesn’t matter whether you care about it or not; it cares about you and takes everything you have, including yourself. This makes the suction a matter of life and death and also persistent. So, it is a suction for succession, and therefore, succession for suction. If there is no interest, there must be one. But what is that one? Couldn’t that be a misidentified suction and interest? And couldn’t that be a misidentified interest, a suction? What determines all the interest and/or suctions around us is ultimately in our benefit or just pushing us forward toward the ultimate suction and/or a means for succession of the ultimate suction. ...